Partner Portal redesign for Broughton Partners

Law firms use the Partner Portal to follow the mass-tort campaigns Broughton Partners runs for them. My task was to redesign it on a new design system, test it with real users and give them the tools they kept asking for.

The redesigned Partner Portal home: KPI cards, retainer and injury distribution, retention rate, order progress and a tort library

Overview

The Partner Portal is where law firms and the Broughton Partners team follow mass-tort marketing campaigns. Orders, signed retainers, case status and support requests all live there. The idea was simple: one place where a firm can see how the marketing done on its behalf is performing.

The product worked, but the interface was getting old. Partners trusted the numbers but still emailed support to understand them.

After: the redesigned home page with KPI cards, charts and order progress
Before: the old home page with a navy sidebar and plain bar charts
Drag the handle to compare the old home page with the redesign

The problem

  • The UI was outdated and important information was hidden in the retainer details, the summary modal and the replacement screens.
  • The dashboard was confusing. New users couldn’t read it and experienced users weren’t getting much out of the charts.
  • There was no way to comment on support tickets and no status updates, so firms only checked the portal when they remembered.
  • Tables showed everything at once, there was no search by injured party and no way to preview documents.
  • Everyone saw the same screens, from solo attorneys to investors who should never see claimant data.
  • Replacements, contact assistance and disengagements were handled by email and phone because the portal had no flow for them.

Who uses it

We created ten personas and they ended up in four groups, each one with a very different job to do.

Design system

The first phase was to redesign what was already there without changing how it worked, and that started with the foundation. We went with Flowbite, an open source design system built on Tailwind CSS. Its components match the code the developers were already writing, so what we designed in Figma was pretty much what got shipped.

Out of the box it looks like every other Tailwind product, so we customised it:

  • Colours, typography, spacing and radius set as variables, using the same names in Figma and in the Tailwind config.
  • One set of badges for retainer, litigation and ticket status, so “Active”, “At risk” or “Settled” look the same everywhere.
  • Data components for the campaign numbers: KPI cards with trends, donut and bar charts, progress and pacing bars.
  • Table patterns like sortable headers, filters, copy buttons, tooltips and pagination.
  • Toasts, modals, dropdowns and empty states, so new features could be put together from existing pieces instead of designed from scratch.
Sidenav component in collapsed and expanded states, with Home, Your Orders and Your Retainers active
Orders table with sortable columns and progress bars
Orders table rebuilt on Flowbite components

User interviews

Before adding anything new we wanted to know if the current functionality was working for the people using it. I emailed partners, invited them to 15 minute sessions on Maze and recorded every one. The script was built around three questions: what’s confusing, what’s missing and what would you do here if you could.

“It didn’t give me any insight. Sure, I have numbers, but why did five not move, or why did one sit at the intake desk for six days?”
Operations lead, referring firm
“I breeze over [the highlights]… when it’s not broken down, it’s almost irrelevant.”
Partner, referring firm

Every quote turned into an insight, an action point and sometimes a question for the team. A few things came up again and again:

  • Numbers without context don’t help. They wanted funnels, timestamps for each step and tooltips explaining a bad number.
  • Campaign progress should be on the home page, with cases acquired and cases left to go.
  • They wanted to see injury mix and geography without exporting everything to a spreadsheet.
  • Tables with fewer columns by default, and the option to add or hide the rest.
  • A data room for agreements, contracts and criteria that you can download in one go.
  • A real conversation on support tickets, keeping the reason for each replacement on record.

User journeys

We mapped the main journeys: first use, checking orders and asking for a replacement, and searching for a case and contacting support. It showed exactly where users were leaving the portal to go back to their inbox.

User journeys for a solo referring partner: first use, checking orders with a replacement request, and searching for a case before contacting support
User journeys for a litigating attorney downloading retainers and a sales rep checking a client's campaign insights

The redesign

Dashboards

The home page now starts with what partners check the most: delivered and accepted retainers compared to last month, retention rate, retainer and injury distribution, and order progress split into accepted and pending. On the order pages you can see the funnel, pacing and timestamps behind every number, and the graphs animate as the data loads.

Order details dashboard with fulfilment progress, funnel and retainer list

Analytics for investors

Non-lawyer partners get their own analytics without any claimant data. Injury and case distribution, age and state census, a settlement calculator, a return forecast and an ROI calculator so they can see what their investment is doing.

Analytics for non-lawyer partners: injury distribution, age and sex census, case status, settlement calculator, state map and ROI calculator

Tables

Tables got most of the microinteractions. Sortable columns, filters, litigation status badges, copy buttons on contact details, tooltips explaining each field and timestamps for every event. Click a row and it opens the full retainer details with all its documents.

Your Retainers table with litigation status badges, copy buttons and delivered dates
Global search returning retainers, orders and tickets as you type
Retainer details with case lifecycle, claimant information, timestamps and documents

Help desk

The new ticket section replaced all those email threads. Firms can open a replacement, contact assistance, disengagement or general request with the case attached, follow open and past tickets, chat with the support team in the same thread and upload documents like disengagement letters.

Tickets view: ticket list, replacement request with retainer details and files, and a threaded comment conversation with support
Create ticket form for a replacement request
Attaching a document to a ticket conversation

Notifications

A notifications centre and toasts let users know when something changes, like a delivered retainer, a reply on a ticket or a replacement. No more refreshing the orders page to see what’s new.

Notifications panel listing retainer deliveries, ticket replies and replacements

Prototype

We prototyped the whole dashboard in Figma, every flow, empty state, filter, toast and modal. Users could click through it during testing and developers could see exactly how each interaction should work before writing any code.

What I’ve learned

Fixing the foundation before adding new features made everything after it a lot faster. Once every screen was on the same design system, a new dashboard or ticket flow was just putting pieces together. And 15 minutes with a real partner settled discussions that could have taken weeks in a meeting room.